Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Red Deck Wins | aenarion45 | 5-0 | 1st in Friday ReCQ - Standard 12:00 pm @ SCG CON Denver |
Izzet Spellslingers | kevincon | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Izzet Spellslingers | hyper | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Izzet Spellslingers | mj_23 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Izzet Spellslingers | nedyahiske | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
Boros Aggro , Boros Auras , Boros Burn , Boros Mice , Gruul Aggro , Gruul Leyline , Izzet Spellslingers , Mardu Prowess , Naya Aggro
Monastery Swiftspear ranks #24 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 7%).
Red average: 57.0%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Monastery Swiftspear is a very strong card that performs well in most contexts.
Recommended number of copies: 4
Performance Efficiency: 47.99 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 70.5%. Monastery Swiftspear has a win rate of 76.0%, making it 7.9% better than other 1-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 15 | 85.8% | 8 |
Third Path Iconoclast | Creature — Human Monk | 24 | 82.9% | 12 |
Ral, Crackling Wit | Legendary Planeswalker — Ral | 7 | 81.6% | 4 |
Slick Sequence | Instant | 19 | 81.5% | 10 |
Bounce Off | Instant | 19 | 74.6% | 9 |
Leyline of the Void | Enchantment | 11 | 74.2% | 3 |
Stock Up | Sorcery | 69 | 73.9% | 27 |
Cori-Steel Cutter | Artifact — Equipment | 68 | 72.5% | 27 |
Furnace Reins | Sorcery | 11 | 71.9% | 7 |
Spell Pierce | Instant | 83 | 70.3% | 35 |
Cards that perform better with Monastery Swiftspear than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 3 | 14 | 83.3% | 75.5% | +7.8% |
Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 2 | 14 | 81.8% | 74.2% | +7.6% |
Abrade | Instant | 2 | 11 | 85.9% | 78.7% | +7.2% |
Case of the Crimson Pulse | Enchantment — Case | 3 | 15 | 79.7% | 73.1% | +6.6% |
Spell Pierce | Instant | 1 | 58 | 80.4% | 74.3% | +6.1% |
This Town Ain't Big Enough | Instant | 5 | 18 | 78.3% | 72.9% | +5.4% |
Stormchaser's Talent | Enchantment — Class | 1 | 61 | 78.8% | 73.7% | +5.1% |
Pawpatch Formation | Instant | 2 | 10 | 78.3% | 73.2% | +5.0% |
Stock Up | Sorcery | 3 | 56 | 78.6% | 73.9% | +4.7% |
Boltwave | Sorcery | 1 | 10 | 84.8% | 80.4% | +4.4% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Red Deck Wins | 1098 | 81.3% | 51.6% |
Gruul Aggro | 652 | 31.6% | 44.0% |
Boros Burn | 197 | 50.4% | 40.1% |
Izzet Spellslingers | 92 | 96.8% | 68.8% |
Gruul Leyline | 54 | 28.4% | 41.6% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.